Precise Shooter

[ Log In ]
Hundreds of guns in stock, over 10000 available for special order! Check out our catalog for near-realtime prices and availability for everything we sell, as well as our super deals page!
We are hiring!
Hours: Tue-Fri: 11am-7pm, Sat: 10am-6pm, Sun-Mon: CLOSED
FFL COPY | FREE HB1143 TRAINING

Letter to Zanders about problems with Spanish Mausers

Dear Zanders:

I have received 55 Mausers that evidently originated from SAMCO auction after that company shut down. They were advertized as Good condition.

NRA defines Antique Good as follows:

Some minor replacement parts; metal smoothly rusted or lightly pitted in places, cleaned or re-blued; principal letters, numerals and design on metal legible; wood refinished, scratched bruised or minor cracks repaired; in good working order.

Not good

Unfortunately, these guns were far from this definition.

To start, the guns still bear the original Samco tags with the importer's original grading. About half of the guns were marked as "PI" - for "poor, incomplete", meaning that the guns were incomplete and in poor condition. About one quarter was marked as "GI" - for "good, incomplete", and the rest were marked as "BA" - or "barreled action", meaning that the gun was imported just as action, without bolt or stock (and stickers had text to that effect).

That alone of course precludes from grading the guns as "good" as they weren't original rifle when imported - they were assembled from a grab bag of parts. The definition of "good condition" from NRA - the standard definition used in the industry, specifically says that replacement parts should be "minor".

For example, the magazine metal on majority of the rifles was incorrect - it came from a mixed bag that contained K98, Yugoslavian, and Spanish parts. This is how magazine bottom should look on a real Spanish Mauser:

And this is what majority of them had:

This is not an innocent substitution - it happens to affect the action of the rifle. Because the parts were foreign, in many cases they did not fit the stock:

As a result, on these rifles there was a gap between the magazine well and the receiver.

The side of the magazine follower often gets lodged into the gap, disabling the function of the magazine.

Cracked and beaten stocks in poor codition

Stocks are in horrible shape in all of these rifles. In my 10+ years of collecting military surplus rifles, I have never before seen stocks in this condition rated "Good". In addition to being simply beat up, majority of stocks are cracked, missing pieces of wood...

...rotten to the point where iron parts do not fit...

Many handguards seem to not match the rifles on which they were installed, and were crudely jammed into the rifles, resulting in bent and sometimes broken metal housing...

...and often the gaps between the rear sights and the wood:

This is how the correct handguard should look like:

Sights

There were a number of rifles where front sights were broken - either crooked...

...missing housing...

...loose housing...

...and, in several cases, the whole fron sight assembly rotating around the barrel:

Almost all rifles had really bad problems with the rear sights.

In almost every rilfe - safe for maybe five out of fifty five - the sights moved in horizontal plane by 1/16th of an inch, which would result in one foot spread in point of impact at 100 yards - just from the sights alone. This of course is completely unacceptable even for a military surplus rifle.

In the past I have owned a large number of old military surplus guns, some in really poor condition - but I have never, ever seen problems with the rear sights at this scale.

Unsafe headspace

I do not own a 7x57 Mauser headspace gages, unfortunately, but I do have 308 Winchester gages. Thirty of fifty five rifles I bought were supposed to be chambered in 7.62x51 NATO. The headspaces for 308 and 7.62 are as follows:

.308 Winchester 7.62x51mm NATO
GO 1.6300 1.6355
NO-GO 1.6340 1.6405
FIELD REJECT 1.6380 1.6455

Of the 20 rifles which I tried, all but five failed to close on 308 Winchester GO gage. This means that the chamber is too tight to safely fire even 308 ammunition, let alone the 7.62 NATO ammunition for which the rifles were advertized.

All in all, of the 20 7x57mm Mausers and 35 7.62NATO Mausers that I bought, only one 7x57 and two 7.62 rifles did not have some disabling defect which would make it possible for me to sell it - and most had more than one problem (for instance, both dangling rear sights and incorrect headspace were present in almost every 7.62 rifle).

Unfortunately, since such a large number of rifles is either mechanically or unsafe to fire, I need to request the return. I can return all of them, or keep the three that I identified as good and return the rest. Please let me know how I need to proceed.

Best regards,

Sergey Solyanik

Owner, Precise Shooter LLC