Precise Shooter

[ Log In ]
Hundreds of guns in stock, over 10000 available for special order! Check out our catalog for near-realtime prices and availability for everything we sell, as well as our super deals page!
We are hiring!
Hours: Tue-Fri: 11am-7pm, Sat: 10am-6pm, Sun-Mon: CLOSED

Powder Measure Redux Part Four: Trickling in...

In our previous experiment we learned that even the best, most expensive powder measures suck at dispensing stick powders such as Varget. On the other hand, Varget has a number of amazing characteristics such as temperature independence and a burning profile that is particularly suitable for high power which make it indispensable component for long range shooters.

So how do we dispense it accurately?

The method that a lot of reloaders use is to throw a little bit less than the intended load, and then trickle the rest of the powder in using a powder trickler, directly into the scale pan.

What kind of accuracy does this method yield? Since you are normally trickling it into a scale with the best resolution, you wouldn't know (beyond the resolution of that scale), but with my super-accurate microbalance scale I could answer this question!

I did 15 measurements where I first dropped an underweight charge using a powder measure, and then trickled it to be as accurate as I could on RCBS balance scale.

As you can see, standard deviation is roughly 0.027 (the first number is standard deviation of a sample; the second is an estimate of the standard deviation of the technique itself - what would the standard deviation of an infinite series of measurements be.

This means is that there is a 99.8% probability that the drop will be within 0.075 grain from an average - a pretty good accuracy indeed!